iCONECT webinar on 6 November: does the use of analytics in a review really make a difference?

One of the problems in assessing the use of any one technology is that you rarely get the opportunity to compare one approach directly with another. It is time-consuming and expensive enough to undertake a big review exercise once; it is rare that you get the chance to do it a second time with the same reviewers, same dataset, sisters and similar issues.

Atlanta-based Paragon Legal Technology Support recently did have such an opportunity. The review tool was iCONECT XERA and one pass included the use of XERA Analytics powered by CAAT from Content Analyst. The review involved 7TB of data. The saving with the use of analytics was $1.3 million.

The 6 November webinar, which involves speakers from Paragon, from iCONECT and from Content Analyst, tells the story of these parallel reviews. Registration is here.

About Chris Dale

I have been an English solicitor since 1980. I run the e-Disclosure Information Project which collects and comments on information about electronic disclosure / eDiscovery and related subjects in the UK, the US, AsiaPac and elsewhere
This entry was posted in Litigation Support. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s