Huron Legal on the importance of releasing legal holds

It seems obvious, doesn’t it, that documents which have been retained to comply with a legal hold should be released once the reason for the hold goes away?

If the principle is easy, the practice is rather different, not least because those who manage these things are probably busy putting another hold into place. It is, in any event, not necessarily a simple task firstly to be clear that the litigation is no longer reasonably anticipated and secondly to be certain that documents are not subject to multiple holds – after all, document seen as important for one reason are more rather than less likely to be seen as important for another.

Keeping all the documents has its own downsides – not just matters of volume and administration, but to do with a future hold which may bite on documents which the company could properly have disposed of.

These and other subjects are explored in an article by Huron Legal called Release the Chokehold: The Importance of Discharging Legal Holds, part of Huron’s Eye on Discovery series.

About Chris Dale

I have been an English solicitor since 1980. I run the e-Disclosure Information Project which collects and comments on information about electronic disclosure / eDiscovery and related subjects in the UK, the US, AsiaPac and elsewhere
This entry was posted in Litigation Support. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s