NightOwl Discovery White Paper – Seed Sets: the Disclosure Debate

In the US at least, arguments about the use and acceptance of technology-assisted review (TAR) seem to be moving from whether this technology is appropriate to how it is to be used.

The problem with this, or one of them, is that the the debates quickly (and understandably) go over the heads of the lawyers, as technical terms multiply and as apparently conflicting opinions come from different courts in different cases.


David Wallack 
of NightOwl Discovery has written a paper focusing on one particular difficulty, the disclosure of a seed set’s contents and the inclusion of irrelevant documents while building the sets.

The paper is an easy read compared with some of those which are around. It includes links to other papers for those who want to read further.

You can access the white paper, and other NightOwl papers, here.

About Chris Dale

I have been an English solicitor since 1980. I run the e-Disclosure Information Project which collects and comments on information about electronic disclosure / eDiscovery and related subjects in the UK, the US, AsiaPac and elsewhere
This entry was posted in Litigation Support. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s