OpenText article on challenges to TAR process in SDNY

Adam Kuhn of OpenText reports in an article headed SDNY Rejects Challenges to TAR Process Despite Missteps, Upholds Reasonableness Standard on a case in the Southern District of New York whose focus is on the transparency required from a party using technology-assisted review.

The receiving party identified some apparent errors in the production (later described as de minimis) and asked the court to order that more information be provided about how the exercise was conducted.

Although the court did order the defendant to amplify in one respect on information given to the plaintiffs, the defendant’s method was generally approved.

The cased raised questions about the degree of transparency required from a party using technology-assisted review and about the relative merits of TAR 1.0 (requiring the use of seed sets) and the continuous machine learning approach used by OpenText.

The article contains links to other OpenText resources useful to those who are keen to understand the different approaches to the use of technology-assisted review and the efficiencies which can be achieved.

Home

About Chris Dale

I have been an English solicitor since 1980. I run the e-Disclosure Information Project which collects and comments on information about electronic disclosure / eDiscovery and related subjects in the UK, the US, AsiaPac and elsewhere
This entry was posted in Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, OpenText, Predictive Coding, Recommind, Technology Assisted Review and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s